Template:Did you know nominations/Tail wagging in dogs
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 15:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ineligible nomination
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tail wagging by dogs
- ... that dogs' brains exhibit lateralized function as demonstrated by side bias in tail wagging? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed:
Created/expanded by Jpritch29 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC).
- Note: Tail wagging by dogs is an existing article, but this nomination was apparently for the reorganized/expanded User:Jpritch29/Tail wagging by dogs. Much more work would be required to achieve the required five times expansion (or you could try for Good article status), but nothing can be done until the new material is mainspaced. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jpritch29. I see that, as Mandarax mentioned, you have a sandbox at User:Jpritch29/Tail wagging by dogs. If you feel that the material is complete and meets all the policies, you may want to add that material to the main page about tail wagging by dogs. However, you haven't edited the "tail wagging by dogs" article at all. Even if you do add this material, this would only represent a two-time expansion of the prose (4,266 bytes in your sandbox vs. 2,196 bytes in the current article). I do suggest that you take Mandarax's advice and either continue working in your sandbox until you have the required 11,000 bytes of readable text (for five-fold expansion), or improve this page to Good Article status. Note that this 11,000 bytes will only include readable output, not references, templates, or any other formatting. epicgenius (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
