Template:Did you know nominations/Sylvia Sayer
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by sstflyer 02:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Sylvia Sayer
[edit]... that Lady Sayer, described as a militant conservationist, interrupted live firing exercises in an army range on Dartmoor to photograph damage done to ancient monuments?
5x expanded by Smalljim (talk). Self-nominated at 17:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC).
- Article nominated within 7 days of 5x expansion beginning, plenty long enough, well cited, neutral enough, and no evidence from the sources I can access of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. The hook is interesting, short enough, and both hook facts are accurately cited inline to articles in The Times which I can access via their digital archive. QPQ done.
I wonder if the hook might be "hookier" if the described as a militant conservationist bit were omitted? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Article nominated within 7 days of 5x expansion beginning, plenty long enough, well cited, neutral enough, and no evidence from the sources I can access of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. The hook is interesting, short enough, and both hook facts are accurately cited inline to articles in The Times which I can access via their digital archive. QPQ done.
- Thanks for the review. I chose the original text because I liked the play between "militant" and the military, but I guess it doesn't come across very well, so:
- ALT1 ... that Lady Sayer interrupted live firing exercises in an army range on Dartmoor to photograph damage done to ancient monuments?
- —SMALLJIM 10:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)