Template:Did you know nominations/Supreme Sultan

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 10:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Supreme Sultan

(

)

~~... that Supreme Sultan became immortalized with a bronze statue?~~

ALT1:...that at the age of 6, Supreme Sultan topped the futurity sire ratings of Saddle and Bridle magazine?

Created by User:Horsegeek. Self-nominated at 17:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC).

I don't know how to fix my username problem...? Horsegeek^(talk) 17:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Horsegeek

- Looks like it's fixed now. I made some formatting fixes to the proposed hooks, also. Might I propose yet another? Montanabw^(talk) 04:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC) :
ALT2 ... that Supreme Sultan was immortalized with a bronze statue at Kentucky Horse Park?

The article is new enough (moved from sandbox to mainspace), long enough, hooks are short enough, article is neutral. This is only the third DYK this user has nominated, so no qpq needed. BUT...

The original Hook is catchy, and sourced, but we don't even know the topic is a horse (which may be the point, which is clever) However... I found it a bit too clever, so proposed ALT2. ALT1 is probably a bit too in-universe for non-horse people, plus it's unsourced. It can't be used unless you add a footnote for it. (and one of the sources says he led the list at age 11, not 6...) Also, I spotted a bit of close paraphrasing and some unsourced bits you need to fix. I went into the article and tagged those spots and did some rewriting to clean up the problem areas I spotted. So, because I'm no longer a neutral reviewer, given that I proposed a hook and edited the article we need a different person to complete the review. Montanabw^(talk) 05:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

New reviewer needs to review the hooks and the article revisions. Montanabw^(talk) 05:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT2 hook facts have inline citations to reliable sources and the article is neutral. I believe any copyright issues have been dealt with. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)