Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Sumner Z. Kaplan

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 17:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Sumner Z. Kaplan

(
)
Portrait of Sumner Z. Kaplan
Portrait of Sumner Z. Kaplan

5x expanded by RightCowLeftCoast (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sumner Z. Kaplan; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • A nice article about an interesting figure. I concur that there has been a 5x expansion and that I find no plagiarism here. Article meets DYK-relevant policies. Good to go. Promoter please note nominator requests for hook to be used on specific date. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 19:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
    • Regrettably, the submitted QPQ was a review with a severe error: the article had been moved from draftspace to mainspace on the same day it was nominated, so it was new enough, however the review failed it for newness reasons. Either the original QPQ will need to be re-reviewed, or a new QPQ will be needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: I have passed the QPQ nomination per the findings of Skyshifter (talk · contribs).--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 02:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • QPQ review has been successfully completed; restoring tick per review above by Ezlev. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
  • RightCowLeftCoast, I don't think any of these hooks are that interesting to an uninformed audience—the first two definitely do not meet the standard, and the third is fairly meh. Could you please suggest some more interesting hooks? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Are any of the above new hooks acceptable? If not, why not? If not, can they be approved upon?--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 23:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
ALT5 is fairly meh (a US politician opposing communism? no way!) but the other two have potential. New reviewer needed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  • @AirshipJungleman29: It was a big deal that during the Cold War that an American Army officer opposed anti-communist legislation. At the time it was the norm for those in the military to oppose communism, not oppose anti-communist efforts.

On Beacon Hill, Mr. Kaplan did not shy from taking stands that bucked the prevailing mood. In the mid-1950s, when US Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin turned the red scare into something of a national obsession, the Massachusetts House passed a bill calling for public school teachers to be fired if they refused to say if they were Communists.
In an unsuccessful attempt to get the bill reconsidered, Mr. Kaplan questioned its constitutionality and said it turned teachers into “second-class citizens.’’

— Bryan Marquard, The Boston Globe
Therefore if there is a want for a pro-communism during the 1950s hook, alt5 which was strikethrough'd by another editor above, would be it.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 19:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Oh right! That'll teach me to read properly. ALT5 unstruck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Due to delays in hook selection, this will miss the initial goal of having this hook go up on the article subject's birthday of 3 February. Therefore, once approved can this hook please be held until the anniversary of the article subject's death of 22 March?--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 23:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset and AirshipJungleman29: Is the new review tick the appropriate tick for this nomination? Is there something wrong with the article? This delay has caused this DYKN to miss the first requested date of February 3rd, and I hope it isn't delayed so it missed the second requested date of March 22nd.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Yes, the new review icon is appropriate: someone is needed to review ALT3, ALT4, and ALT5 since the previous three hooks have been struck; the nomination cannot pass without a review of those hooks. It is highly unlikely that it will take six more weeks to get this passed. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The problem with ALT5 is that, as written, there isn't any context as to when Kaplan was, so a layreader would not know it was unusual at the time. ALT3's source says "According to Eleanor, the Kennedys didn't speak to my grandfather for years"; I'm not convinced that this definitely says that Kaplan disliked Ted. ALT4 appears in the article and is sourced, park to [1] and rabbi and brigadier general to [2], though I'd expect a more merciless prepbuilder to truncate ALT4 at 'Kaplan'. I'm happy with this running on 22 March - let's roll.--Launchballer 00:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
RightCowLeftCoast, I see that you have changed the secondary request in recent comments from 20 March to 22 March, but the article says that Kaplan died on 20 March. Shouldn't this be under 20 March rather than 22 March? If not, what's the special occasion for 22 March? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset:My apologies for my typo. You're correct that the subject, BG Kaplan, did die on 20 March, not 22 March.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 12:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I've moved the nom to March 20 in the special occasion section. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Sumner_Z._Kaplan&oldid=1213012453"