Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Sue Miller (cancer activist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Sue Miller (cancer activist)

[edit]
  • ... that after a mastectomy ended her professional modeling career, Sue Miller assembled a fashion show featuring only womenmodels who had had mastectomies? Source: "[I] decided I would do it but only if I could use models who had breast cancer" (Westword), "Sue started arranging and participating in fashion shows that featured women who had undergone mastectomies as models." (Intermountain Jewish News)

Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 00:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC).

  • So in the article the source used for the hook and a lot of other citations is not right, the link and the title do not match - probably a copy and paste error since you have the right article here. MPJ-DK (talk) 03:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • @MPJ-DK: I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're talking about. Yoninah (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Oh, you mean the Westword source? Not sure why that happened. I corrected the link in the article. Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - ?
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The 25% copyright violation rating is for quotes and common facts that are hard to reword, no issues in that MPJ-DK (talk) 03:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC) Note: The article uses the word "prothesis" which links to a disambiguation page and none of the definitions listed seem to fit the context here. I will not do the source review until you've made the link correction etc. MPJ-DK (talk) 03:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

@MPJ-DK: I'm pretty sure the intended word was prosthesis; I've fixed the spelling/link. 97198 (talk) 06:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid I will have to recuse myself from the remainder of this review. Someone else please pick it up and complete it. MPJ-DK (talk) 23:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I have gone through with the Earwig copyvio detector and addressed the copyvio concerns; all it reports now are titles, quotations, names of institutions, events, and awards, or common phrases such as "was diagnosed with breast cancer". None of these are problems. I have also gone through and checked the sourcing, including the sourcing for the hook, which I like. Someone else should be able to sign off on this now. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • starting review. Zeete (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • New, long enough per DYK check, 4,376 length as of Dec 26, longer now; cited; neutral; Earwig reports violation unlikely 13.8%; hook cited, interesting; QPQ done; Looks good to go. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)