Template:Did you know nominations/Still Life with Books
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Still Life with Books
Still Life with Books
- ... that Still Life with Books (pictured) by Jan Lievens is an example of the vanitas genre of painting? Source: Jan Lievens’ vanitas of leather bindings and shrivelled old papers in “Still Life with Books” and vanitas still-life genre - Spanish Vanitas Versus Dutch Vanitas - Still life with books by Jan Lievens, ca. 1627, via Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
- ALT1: ... that for many years Still Life with Books (pictured) was thought to be a painting by Rembrandt? Source: Though it now seems difficult to mistake Rembrandt for Lievens, in a painting such as the Rijksmuseum’s Still Life with Books it is easy to see why Lievens’s early pictures were confused with Rembrandt’s. Indeed, though most experts now give the painting to Lievens, its attribution has floated between the two for decades.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bayfront MRT station
- Comment: I used archived links for the nomination since the sources were paywalled.
Moved to mainspace by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 19:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Still Life with Books; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
