Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Steven W. Carabatsos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 14:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Steven W. Carabatsos

[edit]

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self-nominated at 12:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 11:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 3125 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely (0.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment: I think Ellison used the phrase "took a chain-saw to it" as a figurative expression; I doubt Carabatsos actually cut the script with a chainsaw. Miyagawa, if you really want to use ALT1, perhaps we can put the phrase "took a chainsaw" in quotation marks? -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I've added the quotations - that was an oversight. Miyagawa (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review still needed by human reviewer. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Article is new enough, and long enough. It is neutrally written, cited inline to reliable sources (AGF on the ones I cannot access) and free of any copyvios that I can find. The hooks are in the article and cited inline, once again AGF on source. QPQ complete. Personally, I prefer the original hook, but there is no problem with the ALT, so I leave it up to the promoter. Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)