The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Overall, article meets all the requirements for DYK. Both hooks are interesting and QPQ has been satisfied. I see no reason not to approve this DYK. JJonahJackalope (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)