The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by Bobamnertiopsis (talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC).
Looks good to me. Ready for DYK.
Per WP:DYKN#How to review a nomination, reviews are supposed to specify the criteria reviewed and how the article and hook compared against the requirements. I realize it's been a while since you reviewed at DYK, Bamse, but review of this nature, and unsigned at that, is far from adequate. A new, full review is needed. If another reviewer would like to step in, they are welcome to do so, as Bamse has not edited on Wikipedia in nearly three weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Trying again. Sorry, but indeed it has been a while since my last review. Hope this procedure could be simplified or made less error prone for occasional editors like me. bamse (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:DYKN#How to review a nomination, reviews are supposed to specify the criteria reviewed and how the article and hook compared against the requirements. I realize it's been a while since you reviewed at DYK, Bamse, but review of this nature, and unsigned at that, is far from adequate. A new, full review is needed. If another reviewer would like to step in, they are welcome to do so, as Bamse has not edited on Wikipedia in nearly three weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
bamse (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)