Template:Did you know nominations/Spherical basis
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by SL93 (talk) 03:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Spherical basis, Cartesian tensor
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that because a Cartesian tensor is usually reducible, the rotation properties of a tensor are more naturally expressed in a spherical basis?
- Comment: Refs could be more in-line than they are. Complain to the author.
Created by Maschen (talk). Nominated by Teply (talk) at 08:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC).
New enough, long enough and neutral. But the hook needs a source, and the lack of inline citations is a real issue. (Technically this is irrelevant to DYK, but although the subjects are clearly notable, these articles are more like extracts from a textbook on algebraic geometry than encyclopedia entries. There is no background, nothing about who developed the theorems, and little about their significance.) At minimum they need inline cites to online sources, and given the very technical nature I would say they need some sort of certification from an applied mathematician. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- I appreciate the nominations - but it's far too early for them to be nominated for anything beyond "start" class.
- Sources can be moved inline anytime - I was trying to get the structure of the articles organized before juggling citations around, some citations will be moved inline and added later today or tomorrow.
- The "textbook" styles occur because they are taken from extracts of textbooks (not word for word, obviously), and will gradually become encyclopedic prose.
- History sections are important and would be there if I had sources about them.
- It takes time. Regards to all, M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 06:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles have not changed since original review, and will likely not be edited to meet DYK requirements any time soon. Closing the nomination, with thanks for the submission. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
