Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Rhodesia Act 1965
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:06, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Southern Rhodesia Act 1965
[edit].svg)
Southern Rhodesian flag
- ... that the Southern Rhodesia Act 1965 was designed to affirm British rule in Southern Rhodesia (flag pictured) after their Unilateral Declaration of Independence, but it was largely ignored in Rhodesia? Source: Unlocking Constitutional and Administrative Law. Routledge. p. 160. ISBN 1444179624.
- Reviewed: Pythagoras
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 09:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough and within policy regarding neutrality, sourcing and close paraphrasing. Volcanoguy 02:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
@The C of E: the hook uses the word "Rhodesia" three times. Could you fix that? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Strictly speaking it only mentions Southern Rhodesia twice and Rhodesia once. I see no reason to change it as one is the name the act, the other is referencing the British colony and one is referring to the "rebel" state. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think you could pipe the link to some other wording. You could also rephrase the ending: "but it was largely ignored in the latter country/colony/state". Yoninah (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose it is a matter of personal choice, I personally prefer my wording so I will ask @Volcanoguy: to restore the tick please. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
