Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Sony Xperia XZ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator

Sony Xperia XZ

[edit]

Created by Ayub407 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article is new and was created on 14:47, 01 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 3375 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (3.8% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 124 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 95 characters
    • Ayub407 has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 3 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 03:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

  • @Ayub407: - I gotta say this reads like an ad for the phone, I don't think that's appropriate for the front page of Wikipedia.  MPJ-DK  22:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • While the hook itself is fine, and the article is new, the neutrality is called into question. As noted by MPJ-DK, it appears to read more like a press release for all the fabulous bits and bobs this new device has to offer. I'd want to see a section on development and Reception before considering to pass this. (Also QPQ needs to be done).--Coin945 (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
I would like to withdraw my nomination because I need more time to expand the article as there no reliable sources for development and reception available at this time. Btw, according to the bot, I have to do QPQ after 3 more DYK nominations. Ayub407talk 07:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Ahh yes, you are correct regarding QPQ.--Coin945 (talk) 08:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)