Template:Did you know nominations/Solomon Creek
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Solomon Creek
[edit]
- ... that the alkalinity load of Solomon Creek (pictured) at the Buttonwood Tunnel is 135,660.8 pounds (61,534.7 kg) per day?
ALT 1: ... that the Solomon Creek (pictured) boreholes are the second-largest sources of iron discharge in the Coal Region, contributing 9.07% of the iron load in the region?
ALT 2: ... that there are 100-foot (30 m) mounds of pink and orange coal ash on the banks of Solomon Creek (pictured)?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 18:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC).
Article appears to be ready. I like Alt 1. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
This needs a full review, with the aspects reviewed (e.g., length, age, neutrality, hook and article sourcing, close paraphrasing) specified. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fine.
QPQ requirements met. Article is long enough and contains red links, but they could be used to create further articles. This article does not contain any copyright violations. Citation "luzerne.jpg" has a title in the image that could be used instead. Citations "Project Narrative" and "WB&H" need more authorship information in citation (i.e. publisher, writer if known). ViperSnake151 Talk 17:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- }. The article is now in an acceptable state. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fine.
