The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Overall: Very well written article with reputable sources. Hook checks out – have checked the cited Nature article through my university's institutional subscription. Great work! intforce (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)