Template:Did you know nominations/Smiley v. Holm
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Smiley v. Holm
- ... that when queried at her confirmation hearing about the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Smiley v. Holm, Justice Amy Coney Barrett replied that she wasn't aware of the decision? Source: Vox: "Indeed, when Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) asked Barrett about Smiley v. Holm, a 1932 Supreme Court decision rejecting the doctrine, during Barrett’s confirmation hearing, the future justice said that she wasn’t even aware of this case"
Created by Extraordinary Writ (talk). Self-nominated at 04:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC).
New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Hook fact checks out and is interesting. No textual issues. Looking good. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Promoting the main hook (ALT0) to Prep 2 – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)