Template:Did you know nominations/Slave-making ant; Trophobiosis

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 00:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Slave-making ant, Trophobiosis

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that the practices of insect slavery and husbandry are both found in ants (ant carrying an aphid pictured)?

Reviewed: Lagerpeton; Lythronax
Comment: joint nomination; reviews ~~to come soon~~ done

Created/expanded by Jonkerz (talk), Kevmin (talk). Nominated by Kevmin (talk) at 16:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC).

Found what seems to be a copyvio, the section Obligate and facultative slave-makers is a clone of this Darkness Shines (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
The raids section is copied from this. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
The lede is copied from here. I am getting this speedied for multiple copyvios. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:27, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

All chunks of text copied from other articles are from open access articles (cc-by) or in the public domain. From the ones you linked:

Role of early experience in ant enslavement: a comparative analysis of a host and a non-host species: "This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."
Do host species evolve a specific response to slave-making ants?: "This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."
Psyche: Author Guidelines: "Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited"

jonkerz ♠talk 12:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Is this one also open access? Darkness Shines (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Nope, zeably.com obviously copied that from WP (from the text I wrote based on OA articles) without attributing it. Note how all the "Related Topics" on that page are wikilinks used in the article. jonkerz ♠talk 13:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

How about this one? Or this one? 13:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Darkness Shines (talk)

"Rossomyrmex, the Slave-Maker Ants from the Arid Steppe Environments: "Copyright © 2013 F. Ruano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."
The article from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov is mirrored from Frontiers in Zoology which I've already linked above. jonkerz ♠talk 13:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I have removed the speedy tag, but am not convinced. I will not take further part in this review, sorry. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:16, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. jonkerz ♠talk 13:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:PLAGIARISM#Copying_material_from_free_sources, any material copied from freely licensed sources needs to be correctly attributed (which by our standards means more than just citing). Furthermore, the slave-making ant article does not have enough original material to qualify for DYK. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)