The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Long enough. New enough. well-written with reliable citations throughout. QPQ is good, reliable sources are used properly throughout the article and the hook is cited, verified, short enough, neutral, and interesting! good to go! Taung Tan (talk) 18:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)