Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Sicyos angulatus

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Sicyos angulatus, Echinocystis

[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links:
)
Wild cucumber
Wild cucumber
 Source: "A very bitter tea brewed from the roots is analgesic and is also used as a love potion" "A decoction of the vine has been used in the treatment of venereal disease."

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 11:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC).

  • starting review--Kevmin § 03:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: Sicyos angulatus expansion new enough and long enough. hook portion cited and sourced with to verified references. No policy issues identified with the article. I would switch love potion and decoction so they correspond better to the species..--Kevmin § 16:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Echinocystis expansion new enough and long enough. The hook is referenced and the citations confirm the hook. I might cite Wisconsin to avoid nitpicking later. Also the range section is partially cited but the one citation does not cover all the information, I would suggest moving the USDA link to a citation for the section. as it was before the expansion. No policy issues were identified with the articles.
  • The opening sentences of the two articles are rather clunky with "gourd/melon/cucumber family" cucumbers are a melon (all are technically pepos so cutting it ti just "the gourd family" would match the other Cucurbitaceae articles.--Kevmin § 14:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
  • @Kevmin: Thanks for the review. I have changed the hook around to give ALT1 and made the other changes you suggested. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Articles still meeting the DKY criteria and no policy issues identified in either, or copyvio problems. the nom looks good to go.--Kevmin § 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Cwmhiraeth, while Sicyos angulatus appears to have been expanded enough, when I use DYKcheck on Echinocystis it says the article is not a 5x expansion. In fact, it's about 3.5x: from 553 prose characters prior to the expansion to 1953 prose characters now. The article will need to be expanded to 2765 prose characters to meet the 5x expansion requirement. Is this feasible? BlueMoonset (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset and Cwmhiraeth: I have expanded Echinocystis to 3,653 characters (by my DYKcheck count), but the article will need a new reviewer now that I have added to it.--Kevmin § 04:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Most of the articles I expand are tiny stubs and I had completely failed to realise that this one was 553B before I began, and hence I had not expanded it enough. Thank you BlueMoonset for pointing it out and thank you Kevmin for expanding it so well. I have added your name to the credits. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Happy to sign off on this. I can verify the previous review: I rechecked most aspects. The expansion also checks out. The hook is a trifle wordy, but definitely interesting. Vanamonde (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Sicyos_angulatus&oldid=1018464360"