Template:Did you know nominations/Shirou Emiya

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Shirou Emiya

(

)

... that Shirou Emiya was originally conceived by writer Kinoko Nasu in his spare time as a high school student years before the making of the visual novel Fate/stay nightType-Moon (2006). Character Material (in Japanese). Type-Moon. p. 12.? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that Shirou Emiya was initially conceived as a woman but became a man in order to fit the demographic of the visual novel Fate/stay night? Nasu, Kinoko; Takeuchi, Takashi (2006). "The Fate/stay night Staffs Interview". website (Interview). Dengeki Online. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2018.

Shirou Emiya's characterization was changed for the Fate/stay night: Unlimited Blade Works to appear as a more cheerful person in contrast to his original persona. Fate/stay night Unlimited Blade Works Blu-ray Disc Box I Booklet. Type-Moon. 2015. p. 5.

In each of the three routes from the visual novel Fate/stay night, Shirou's characterization takes a different progress due to the multiple options and dilemmas he is given.Nasu, Kinoko; Takeuchi, Takashi (2006). "The Fate/stay night Staffs Interview". website (Interview). Dengeki Online. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2018.

Improved to Good Article status by Tintor2 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC).

Came by to review this - just a friendly reminder to @Tintor2: that you still have complete a WP:QPQ before this can be reviewed Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk)

@Satellizer: Currently reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Kyler Murray.Tintor2 (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Article was promoted to GA recently enough, is definitely long enough, meets neutrality/citations/paraphrasing requirements, the hooks are appropriate (I personally recommend going with ALT1) and properly cited. QPQ done - should be good to go. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 11:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@Satellizer: Okay, let's go with alt 1.Tintor2 (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I came by to promote this, but the QPQ was done incorrectly. Two other editors immediately pointed out the newness fail. Please provide another QPQ. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Currently reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Women's suffrage in film. Its hook seems good while the article was recently created.Tintor2 (talk) 22:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

QPQ done, thanks. Restoring tick per Satellizer's review. Yoninah (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)