Template:Did you know nominations/Shanghai Trolleybus Route 20
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Shanghai Trolleybus Route 20
Shanghai Trolleybus Route 20
- ... that an estimated 9 of every 10 residents of Shanghai have ridden the city's trolleybus route 20 (fleet bus pictured)? Source: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1628710844871870842&wfr=spider&for=pc (translation of title: Route 20, which 9 out of 10 Shanghai residents have ridden, is getting a major upgrade!)
- ALT1: ... that in the 1980s, Shanghai Trolleybus Route 20 was so popular that it required nearly 65 buses running per day and a frequency of 30 seconds between buses? Source: https://www.jfdaily.com/sgh/detail?id=683630 (上世纪八十年代中期20路公交车高峰时期 每班车间隔仅仅有30秒时间 18米长的铰接式20路多达65部, translation: During the peak time of trolleybus route 20 in the 1980s, the frequency between buses is only 30 seconds, and there were as many as 65 18-meter articulated buses running on the route)
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Created via AFC. Please only use the pic if the main hook is chosen.
Moved to mainspace by SBS6577P (talk). Self-nominated at 13:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Shanghai Trolleybus Route 20; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Interesting hook and good article, meets eligibly and length requirements. Generally well-sourced, but some outstanding citations needed. Would add the hook fact into the body of the article. Edited the hook for conciseness.
- Addressed the sourcing issues. Hook fact is already in the 2nd paragraph of the article. SBS6577P (talk) 00:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also since someone’s probably gonna ask about the revert of Baijiahao sources earlier, Imma just put the clarification here. While Baijiahao is considered as a UGC (as Rastintion stated), in this case the 2 sources are published by local media outlets that can be considered reliable (source 2 in particular is published by the same organization as the one that wrote source 15). I would’ve loved to find the original web pages that are not on Baijiahao but unfortunately I can’t. I checked in on RSN previously, someone replied that “As far as I understand Baidu Baijiahao is kind of a blog platform. If a news agency or a local municipality publishes something on such a platform, we can use it, just as we allow links to youtube videos posted in the official channels of reliable sources”, so I just inserted them in. SBS6577P (talk) 00:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
@Longhornsg: Any more feedback for me? SBS6577P (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Longhornsg: Any more feedback? SBS6577P (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping. Made some additional ce changes and edits for readability. Good to go. Longhornsg (talk) 16:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
