The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 20:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Overall: Passes DYK checklist. New. Easily long enough. Picture used. Both hooks have been verified as sourced. I prefer Alt 1. Less controversial than the "exploitation" concept, which is from a relatively old source. Earwig's copy violation detector gives it a clean bill of health. Every paragraph is cited. I did not have access to the book that is the source for the hook, but I AGF. Good job! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Still good to go. I've now seen the snippet Rogerson, S.; McIntyre, J. (2006). Dive Red Sea. Ultimate Sports. p. 311. that directly supports the Alt hook. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Super-short means bigger page visits, intriguing, ambiguous, makes you want to click it. (Ext link would obviously not be used for actual DYK. It's just so you can see the club.)Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm OK with ALT 2, too. I've already said my piece as to preference, but the two listed creators are always worth a listen. I defer to my betters. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll be happy any way it goes. I defer to all of you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Passes DYK checklist. New. Easily long enough. Picture used. Both hooks have been verified as sourced. I prefer Alt 1. Less controversial than the "exploitation" concept, which is from a relatively old source. Earwig's copy violation detector gives it a clean bill of health. Every paragraph is cited.