Template:Did you know nominations/Seoullo 7017 Skypark

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Seoullo 7017 Skypark

(

)

Seoullo 7017 Skypark

... that Seoul has a new elevated park, Seoullo 7017 Skypark, converted from a disused overpass? Source: "http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/say-hello-to-new-sky-park-seoullo
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Created by Keneckert (talk). Self-nominated at 08:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC).

New enough. Long enough. NPOV. No QPQ required. Earwig and spot-checking found no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism (except for quoted passages, of course). Interesting enough hook is cited, and article is well-cited. Edwardx (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Keneckert and Edwardx: Comment: was about to promote, but noticed the source said that the overpass was "worn-out after over 40 years of heavy use" and not "disused" as the hook claims. HaEr48 (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

@HaEr48: "disused" merely means no longer being used, the reason is immaterial - it is not being used for its original purpose. Disused seems a reasonable descriptor. Edwardx (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)