The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Looks good overall, new enough, long enough and seems neutral. Hook is interesting. Sufficiently sourced. The last line needs slight copy-edit to avoid close paraphrasing. Grandmaster 00:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the review @Grandmaster:! I've copyedited the article to reduce paraphrasing. Let me know if it needs anything else to get it ready . BuySomeApples (talk) 03:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Wonderful! The article is good to go. Grandmaster 09:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)