Template:Did you know nominations/Scotch Run (Black Creek)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Scotch Run (Black Creek)
[edit]- ... that in 1965, it was noted that Scotch Run had never run dry for at least 52 years?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 21:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, QPQ performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems, every paragraph has at least one inline citation. The hook is verified by an inline citation to a reliable source in the article. I recommend ALT1 below, which provides a little more background. NORTH AMERICA1000 11:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)- ALT1: ... that in 1965, it was noted that despite summer droughts in the area, the Scotch Run tributary had never run dry for at least 52 years?
- @Northamerica1000: I like ALT1, but perhaps the word tributary should be removed. It's a bit redundant; every stream is a tributary of something. --Jakob (talk) 12:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Jakec: I feel that use of the word informs the reader, whereas its omission leaves people guessing what it is (lake, river, pond, stream, etc). NORTH AMERICA1000 12:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Northamerica1000: Fair enough, I suppose it cold work. --Jakob (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
