Template:Did you know nominations/Say Anything (BoJack Horseman)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Say Anything (BoJack Horseman)
- ... that for an episode of BoJack Horseman after Netflix noted to production that it did not feature BoJack Horseman enough, they added a cardboard cutout of him? Source: From Entertainment Tonight [1] Quote from creator and showrunner of BoJack Horseman: "Netflix was originally hesitant about that. There was some debate about how dark this show is. You know, what can this show be? Is it just a comedy? Is it just about BoJack? Originally, there was less of BoJack in it, and one way to sway Netflix is we went back in and we made it much more about BoJack. And we made sure every act ends on a BoJack beat.
Then, we also had this idea that BoJack brings in this cardboard version of himself into Princess Carolyn's office. That was like our subliminal way to make BoJack feel more present in the episode. Even when he wasn't there, there'd be this cardboard cutout of him. It's like a tongue-in-cheek way to attack a note, but it actually does help. I think it does feel like a BoJack episode because BoJack is there in the background saying a Jerry Maguire quote whenever anyone walks by." This is further expanded on the creator commentary of the episode: [2] 8:20 - 9:10>
- ALT1: ... that for an episode of BoJack Horseman after Netflix noted to production that it did not feature BoJack Horseman enough, they added a cardboard cutout version of him? Source: From Entertainment Tonight [3] Quote from creator and showrunner of BoJack Horseman: "Netflix was originally hesitant about that. There was some debate about how dark this show is. You know, what can this show be? Is it just a comedy? Is it just about BoJack? Originally, there was less of BoJack in it, and one way to sway Netflix is we went back in and we made it much more about BoJack. And we made sure every act ends on a BoJack beat.
Then, we also had this idea that BoJack brings in this cardboard version of himself into Princess Carolyn's office. That was like our subliminal way to make BoJack feel more present in the episode. Even when he wasn't there, there'd be this cardboard cutout of him. It's like a tongue-in-cheek way to attack a note, but it actually does help. I think it does feel like a BoJack episode because BoJack is there in the background saying a Jerry Maguire quote whenever anyone walks by." This is further expanded on the creator commentary of the episode: [4] 8:20 - 9:10
- Comment: QPQ exempt fewer than five articles nominated
- ALT1: ... that for an episode of BoJack Horseman after Netflix noted to production that it did not feature BoJack Horseman enough, they added a cardboard cutout version of him? Source: From Entertainment Tonight [3] Quote from creator and showrunner of BoJack Horseman: "Netflix was originally hesitant about that. There was some debate about how dark this show is. You know, what can this show be? Is it just a comedy? Is it just about BoJack? Originally, there was less of BoJack in it, and one way to sway Netflix is we went back in and we made it much more about BoJack. And we made sure every act ends on a BoJack beat.
Converted from a redirect by Spy-cicle (talk). Self-nominated at 20:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC).
Full review to follow, but I think the hooks are a bit hard to read. The hook fact is about the staff of BoJack Horseman adding a cardboard cutout of BoJack, but it isn't really articulated well in the hook. Maybe move the mention of the cardboard cutout to the start? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)- @Narutolovehinata5: Is this wording any clearer? Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 09:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- ALT2... that for an episode of BoJack Horseman, production added a cardboard cutout of BoJack Horseman after Netflix said it did not feature him enough?
- I've added a comma to ALT2 but other than that I think ALT2 reads a lot better. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: So is ALT2 wording fine for now? Does that mean we can move onto a full review? Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 19:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've added a comma to ALT2 but other than that I think ALT2 reads a lot better. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Article was new enough at the time of the nomination and is adequately source. No close paraphrasing was found. No QPQ needed. The only issue is that the reference for the hook fact comes not after the actual sentence discussing the cardboard cut-out but rather the following sentence; the reference needs to be duplicated for DYK purposes. ALT2 is the best phrasing of the hook so that's the one we'll go with (although I do wonder if the second mention of "BoJack Horseman" could be changed to either "Bojack", "the title character", or simply "him"). Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- ALT3... that for an episode of BoJack Horseman, production added a cardboard cutout of the title character after Netflix said it did not feature him enough?
- @Narutolovehinata5: I have added the extra cites needed in Production. I have a linked to the character article in ALT2 and have replaced "BoJack Horseman" with "the title character" in ALT3 (though does make it slightly longer). Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 11:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! I think we're good to go with ALT3. I do have some minor MOS:BLUE concerns with the hook, but if anyone else has an issue with them they can be worked out during promotion. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
