Template:Did you know nominations/Sara Branham Matthews
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sara Branham Matthews
[edit]- ... that bacteriologist Sara Branham Matthews was considered to be one of the "grand ladies of microbiology"?
- Reviewed: Death in the West
Created by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 09:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
No image. Good bio with good sources and a fair length. Hook checks out. There is a more tabloid factoid about her being "the killer of millions of killers" but this one works too. Thanks for the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victuallers (talk • contribs) 13:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This review needs more details, in accordance with DYK review instructions. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 23:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- What? The example text given in the review instructions you quote says (for example) "Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened." Thanks for the meta review.
So: Here is my review reworded
Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used and the hook length is fine too.
- I'm not sure that there is a substantial difference, but at least it complies with the documents you cited. Whether it was worth pulling a hook for the difference I will leave for others to judge. I would say that I noted just as many points in both reviews. Victuallers (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)