Template:Did you know nominations/Saputangan
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Saputangan
[edit]- ... that Saputangan, a film that follows a man who restores his beloved's eyesight, was banned in Singapore?
- Reviewed: Bintulu
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC).
Article is well-written, created today, 4,060 readable prose characters. No balance issues that I can see; the article avoids the usual issue of spending too long on the plot summary. Hook seems interesting. Both components of the hook are in the article. The banning is verified from source, and the plot summary is taken in good faith from an offline foreign-language source presented by an experienced Indonesian-speaking editor. —Nizolan (talk) 15:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. The source for the plot summary is here if you want a look. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: That image should be eligible for Commons upload under Article 31 in this license, if it was published in 1949 and the exact author's unknown. Could be worth uploading it there and putting in a link. (Not sure if it applies though since I can't read the language
) —Nizolan (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Though it is free in Indonesia (agree on this point), it is not free in the US owing to the URAA. Anonymous works of art and text (i.e. not photographs, which had a different expiry date) were copyrighted for fifty years after publication at the time of the URAA, and as such the copyright of art/text anonymously published in Indonesia in 1946 or later was extended in the US. Since Commons requires images to be free in both the US and source country... It sucks, I know, but that's how it is. If it weren't for the URAA, all Indonesian films from 1965 or earlier could be uploaded to Commons freely. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: That image should be eligible for Commons upload under Article 31 in this license, if it was published in 1949 and the exact author's unknown. Could be worth uploading it there and putting in a link. (Not sure if it applies though since I can't read the language
