Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Salvador Estrella

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Salvador Estrella

[edit]
General Salvador Estrella
General Salvador Estrella

Created by Arius1998 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC).

  • New & long enough. Within policy, generally sourced, no neutrality or copyvio issue detected. I like the main hook and the ALT1 hook, but they appear to be supported by [1], a geocity web page without any clear authorship information. Could you find a better source? Also, as for QPQ, please complete the review of all criterias, as requested by BlueMoonset. HaEr48 (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the quick review, HaEr48. The primary source would be Esteban A. de Ocampo's book, Some Celebrated Caviteños. Also, the review for Caltrain Express has been closed. Hoping for the passage of this article as DYK. Arius1998 (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@Arius1998: Then can you properly cite that book (and page numbers) inline the article? HaEr48 (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@HaEr48: It is included now. Thanks for the heads up. Arius1998 (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@Arius1998: Thank you. Could you complete the citation please? Meaning ISBN, publisher, year, page number. When that's done we're ready to go. HaEr48 (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@HaEr48: Unfortunately, it is only an eight-page book. Details such as the publisher and ISBN are unknown. Hopefully, this is still adequate? Arius1998 (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@Arius1998: One of the criteria of WP:RS is that it is published in a reliable publishing process. If it has no publisher info, it's kind of inadequate. Can you find a better source? HaEr48 (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@HaEr48: Added a new source. Please check. Thank you. Arius1998 (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Let's go with ALT1 then. Note that I can't access the source online, so passing with AGF. Also, in case the promoter wants to use the image, it has valid copyright tags on Commons. HaEr48 (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)