Template:Did you know nominations/Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store
.jpg)
Saks Fifth Avenue flagship
- ... that the Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store (pictured) was made a New York City landmark so a skyscraper annex could be built? Source: Rangel, Jesus (December 22, 1984). "Saks, Named a Landmark, Plans a Corporate Tower". The New York Times.
- ALT1:... that the shoe department of the Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store (pictured) was the first individual story of a building in the United States with its own ZIP Code? Source: "From Designer Shoes to Designer ZIP Codes". ABC News. May 25, 2007. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
- ALT2:... that the Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store (pictured) was described as a "new northern outpost for large retail trade" on New York City's Fifth Avenue when it was proposed? Source: "Review of Real Estate Market for the Current Week". The Real Estate Record: Real estate record and builders' guide. 105 (16): 507. April 17, 1920
- ALT3:... that the Saks Fifth Avenue flagship store (pictured) was valued at $3.7 billion in 2014, more than what its owner had recently paid for the whole Saks Fifth Avenue chain? Source: de la Merced, Michael J.; Bagli, Charles V. (November 24, 2014). "Saks Flagship Store Is Appraised for Mortgage at $3.7 Billion". DealBook.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Reindeer Station
- Comment: Article was moved to mainspace on February 19, 2021.
Created by Ɱ (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 17:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC).
Article is new/long enough, well written, and adequately cited. QPQ has been completed. No pings on Earwigs for copyvio or close paraphrasing, aside from some odd-looking wiki mirror site. Hooks are interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK; ALT1 is the most interesting, followed by ALT3. Morgan695 (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
