The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by sstflyer 14:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a hook about a German topic. I am therefore comfortable with sandwiching this between two US hooks.
Review Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely—promoted to a WP:GA— and article is extravagantly long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. Both hooks are sourced and relate directly to the essence of the article. Although the hook is wonky, it is decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- n/a
Passes DYK checklist.
Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely—promoted to a WP:GA— and article is extravagantly long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. Both hooks are sourced and relate directly to the essence of the article. Although the hook is wonky, it is decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)