Template:Did you know nominations/Ryan Westmoreland
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Ryan Westmoreland
[edit]- ... that Ryan Westmoreland, considered one of the best prospects in baseball, has had brain surgery twice to correct a cavernous malformation?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Loring Commerce Centre
- Comment: May need to be reworded in some ways. "Best prospect" may be too jargony for a non-baseball (or sports) fan. Plus, I'm no expert on the medical condition.
Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self nom at 20:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Looks good to me. I don't think "best prospect" is too jargony; the word is a common term and its use should be readily understood (it's also validly supported by a ref in the article so as not to bring up POV concerns either). Article and hook look good; hook is an amalgam of cited facts that are readily apparent and easy to see in the article. Good to go. GRAPPLE X 23:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- May I suggest "highest rated"? Whether anyone is good/best can be quite subjective & somewhat POV-ish. --PFHLai (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- I had felt that the idea of being a "good prospect" didn't really translate to POV calling someone "good"; though perhaps something suggested he was a "sought-after prospect" might work. GRAPPLE X 17:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think "highest rated" might not work, because he wasn't #1. Maybe we can say "top 100 prospect" or something of the like, since Baseball America, one of the most highly regarded baseball publications, rated him #21. My thought on "best prospect" wast that even though it's subjective, it's not our OR, it was this publication that made their own determination. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I had felt that the idea of being a "good prospect" didn't really translate to POV calling someone "good"; though perhaps something suggested he was a "sought-after prospect" might work. GRAPPLE X 17:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
