Template:Did you know nominations/Russo-Prussian alliance

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 17:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Russo-Prussian alliance

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Russo-Prussian alliance was formed only two years after the signing powers faced one another in the Seven Years War, and allowed them to intervene in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth internal matters?
• ALT 1: ... that the 1764 Russo–Prussian alliance, formed two years after the signatories clashed in the Seven Years' War, allowed them to intervene in internal matters of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth?

• Reviewed: Fortunoff Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies

Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 21:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• The article meets all requirements. I moved it to "Russo–Prussian alliance" (with an en dash instead of a hyphen) for compliance with "WP:ENDASH". I've reworded the hook slightly to shorten it to under 200 characters – see ALT 1. As the references for the hook are in Polish, I have accepted them in good faith. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• Alt seems good to me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 23:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• Is that a pass? If so, perhaps Smuconlaw could add a tick. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Pass! I think Piotrus and I agree that ALT 1 should be used. — SMUconlaw (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)