Template:Did you know nominations/Rumbo Recorders
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rumbo Recorders
- ... that Appetite for Destruction, Guns N' Roses debut studio album, was recorded at a recording studio owned by 1970s pop duo Captain & Tennille? Source: "What do '70s soft rockers the Captain and Tennille have in common with '90s metal merchants Guns N' Roses? A lot more than you would think. The hard-rock group's multimillion-selling "Appetite for Destruction" and "GNR Lies" were both recorded at Rumbo Recorders in a suburban Los Angeles community." https://www.deseret.com/1990/4/14/18856435/hard-rock-groups-pound-out-their-rhythms-in-l-a-studio-owned-by-square-pop-pair
- ALT1: ... that Guns N' Roses debut studio album Appetite for Destruction was recorded at a recording studio founded by 1970s pop duo Captain & Tennille? Source: "What do '70s soft rockers the Captain and Tennille have in common with '90s metal merchants Guns N' Roses? A lot more than you would think. The hard-rock group's multimillion-selling "Appetite for Destruction" and "GNR Lies" were both recorded at Rumbo Recorders in a suburban Los Angeles community." https://www.deseret.com/1990/4/14/18856435/hard-rock-groups-pound-out-their-rhythms-in-l-a-studio-owned-by-square-pop-pair
Created by Synthfiend (talk). Self-nominated at 18:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- No source provided for information about Studio A and Studio C. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough, going live on 29 September. On its initial release it was over 1.8k bytes of text. Not all text is verifiable to a reliable source, including technical information about Studio A, and Studio C. Hook is cited. Hook is interesting enough for random trivia, but nothing that wows me. No images used. Nominator/creator has less than 5 DYKs. Please continue to work on this article. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have corrected the formatting of numerous references that was preventing their displaying correctly. I also added a few more details.synthfiend (talk) 13:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I have added an existing reference to a sentence at the end of a paragraph which lacked a reliable source for verifiability. This should resolve the issue found above. A new reviewer is needed to pass this nomination.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 14:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
seems like that issue was solved. @RightCowLeftCoast: it's always fine to ask for a second opinion, but I don't think there was a conflict of interest or anything on that one. Adding a reference, especially one already in the article, doesn't disqualify you from finishing the review imo—reviewers make small changes to the article all the time instead of asking the nominators to do it for them. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
