Template:Did you know nominations/Rudy Atwood
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Rudy Atwood
- ... that gospel pianist Rudy Atwood, heard on the Old Fashioned Revival Hour radio broadcast of the 1930s–1960s, attributed his hymn arrangements to the influence of J. S. Bach? source: "Atwood began a lifelong study of Bach, and he feels that the influence of his favorite composer is discernible in his hymn playing" ("The Origins of Evangelical Pianism"
- ALT1:... that pianist Rudy Atwood, heard on the Old Fashioned Revival Hour radio broadcast of the 1930s–1960s, was known as "the most imitated pianist in gospel music"? source: Beckley Post-Herald (February 21, 1973)
- ALT2:... that pianist Rudy Atwood was heard on the weekly Old Fashioned Revival Hour radio broadcast by an estimated audience of 20 million listeners in the 1940s–1950s? source: Old Fashioned Revival Hour, Radio World (February 2, 1996)
- Reviewed: Washington Bridge
Created by JGHowes (talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC).
- Article: New. Long enough, I don't see issues with neutrality, it features inline citations.
- Hook:I find both interesting, I accept the first hook in good faith, since I don't have access to JSTOR. For the second one, I would suggest to also add this link, that states that the show had a reach of 20 million listeners. this one mentions Atwood being a part of the show.
- QPQ:checks.
- I like the first hook.
- For the second one, I would suggest integrating those two sources (I don't know if they would consider the link provided a reliable source, but the information is indeed verifiable).--GDuwenHoller! 19:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)