Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Royal intermarriage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 02:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Royal intermarriage

[edit]
  • Reviewed: Not a self-nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Sotakeit (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 23:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC).

  • I am sure many (lest I say most) do know that. Could you suggest a "hookier" hook? Surtsicna (talk) 23:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Or ALT2:... that the Habsburgs adhered to the policy of royal intermarriage so much that they made it their motto, but later came to suffer from consequences of severe inbreeding? People are intrigued by incest. Just ask HBO. Surtsicna (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comments and for providing alternative hooks. I labeled and slightly reformatted the alt hooks. Regarding the original hook, I am not convinced that this is common knowledge to everybody (to experts though, yes obviously). Oceanh (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

  • This newly promoted GA is long enough and nominated within the correct timeframe. Any of the suggested hooks could be used as the facts have inline citations. I detected no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pulled ALT2 from prep because the source [1] doesn't say the motto means that royals must marry royals, only that marriage is a better way of expanding territory/influence than is war. EEng (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Adding the symbol so this won't appear to be ready to move to prep. --Orlady (talk) 02:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm restoring this to the prep area, with minor rewording to eliminate the statement about the motto. --Orlady (talk) 02:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)