The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MrClog (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Overall: Overall, this article looks really, really good. The only sentences to trip the copyvio detector are a few direct quotes, which obviously aren't a problem and add quite a bit to the article. I made two edits, one a basic copyedit and the other to add more context and try to make the article more neutral. I know my second edit may be a bit controversial, but I believe it needed to be made before I could check off the "neutral" element on the checklist. Overall, I think this is a really good article, and I certainly enjoyed reviewing it. Nice work! Michael Barera (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Overall, this article looks really, really good. The only sentences to trip the copyvio detector are a few direct quotes, which obviously aren't a problem and add quite a bit to the article. I made two edits, one a basic copyedit and the other to add more context and try to make the article more neutral. I know my second edit may be a bit controversial, but I believe it needed to be made before I could check off the "neutral" element on the checklist. Overall, I think this is a really good article, and I certainly enjoyed reviewing it. Nice work! Michael Barera (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)