Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Ronald Read (philanthropist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Ronald Read (philanthropist)

[edit]

Created/expanded by Cunard (talk). Self-nominated at 10:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC).

Interesting life, on many sources, no copyvio obvious. Lovely summary in the lead! I am no friend of "shot" in the first image caption ;) - better give us a year. In article and hook, please clarify that we speak about US$. How do you feel about an infobox? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the review and the comment about the "lovely summary in the lead", Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs)! According to https://www.today.com/news/secret-millionaire-vermont-janitor-bequeaths-fortune-hospital-library-t1201, here is the caption they have for the photo "(AP Photo/Estate of Ronald Read) Courtesy of Fitts, Olson & Giddi". To prevent the "shot" wording :) I changed it to "Undated photo of Ronald Read". I tried to look for the photo's date but everything online leaves it undated. I modified the article and hook to use "US$" and added an {{Infobox person}} to the article. That is a generic infobox, so feel free to change it to something more specific.

Cunard (talk) 09:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for all this! The photo doesn't need any caption, if we can't add to the name of the person. "shot" is just too sloppy and ambiguous ;) - I use infobox person for all people, - it's the template with the best maintenance, and the best - neutral white background! - appearance, and if more specific parameters are needed, others can be embedded, but no need here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)