Template:Did you know nominations/Rokel River

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Rokel River

(

)

... that the Rokel River estuary (pictured), which extends over an area of 2,950 square kilometres (1,140 sq mi), became a Ramsar wetland site of importance in 1999?

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 16:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC).

Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Barony of Arcadia

Article expansion checks out, it is generally well referenced and readable, QPQ done and there appear to be no problems with image copyright or close paraphrasing. On the other hand, I am not certain the image is approproate, since it does not depict the river proper, and, more importantly, I could not find the reference for its listing as a Ramsar site. The sentence is unreferenced both in the lede and the main article (it is not covered by ref. #5, which originally was in another paragraph). Constantine ✍ 15:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

I've added a UN ref for the Ramsar sentence. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. References now provided in the lead itself.--Nvvchar. 16:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, now it checks out, good to go. Constantine ✍ 14:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)