The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 13:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: This is fine in every respect. The article is well written and rigorously cited. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Comment I don't see what " (d. after 1113)" adds to either hook? Edwardx (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
It grounds the thing in time (I no longer assume that any random person has any clue what Domesday Book is...) Ealdgyth - Talk 23:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
"… the eleventh-century Norman noblewoman ..."? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. In my opinion, that would be a better solution! Edwardx (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
That works. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)