Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Heinecken
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Robert Heinecken
[edit]- ... that in the 1960s, Robert Heinecken altered mainstream magazines like Time and Vogue by inserting pornographic images and then returned the altered magazines to the newsstands?
- Reviewed: not self nom.
5x expanded by Monmonoclememanque (talk). Nominated by Chris troutman (talk) at 07:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC).
-
- @Muboshgu: Ok, I added in-line citations. You can complete the review now. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. I didn't see the ping. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Article was 407 B in February, pre-expansion. Major expansion on March 9 leads us to a 2377 B article, more than 5x. Every paragraph has at least one source, and every statement that would appear to require a source has one. NY Times source supports the hook. Slight reword to the hook because that conditional tense is a pet peeve of mine for events that did happen. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
