Template:Did you know nominations/Rivalry

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:09, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Rivalry

(

)

... that rivalries encourage people to take more risks and behave more unethically?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Social Emotional Development But it will probably take a little while for me to get done with it. Article is pretty huge. GMG ^talk 18:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Created by BD2412 (talk) and GreenMeansGo (talk). Nominated by GreenMeansGo (talk) at 14:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC).

Source 1: After controlling for a wide range of factors that might also influence teams’ decisions — including teams’ general propensities for risk-taking, time left in the game, score, week of the season, yardline and yards to go, the relative ability levels of the teams (determined from ESPN rankings), and whether the teams were in the same conference or division — we found that rivalry between teams predicted greater risk-taking.[1]
Source 2: Across a series of experiments and an archival study, we found that rivalry was associated with over-reporting of performance, deception, and unsportsmanlike behavior. Further, we observed that merely thinking about a rival was enough to increase unethicality.[2]

This article seems to have been moved into mainspace to replace a redirect on 4th December. As such, it is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and Earwig did not bring up anything untoward. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

How about
ALT1 ... that rivalries encourage people to take more risks and behave less ethically?

E Eng 04:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

It doesn't really matter to me. I was just following the wording of the sources, which was "increase a negative" rather than "decrease a positive". GMG ^talk 11:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)