Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Rise of Macedon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Rise of Macedon

[edit]
A bust of Philip II of Macedon (r. 359–336 BC– )
A bust of Philip II of Macedon (r. 359–336 BC– )
  • Comment: This bust portrait can be used with either the origin hook or the ALT1 hook.

Improved to Good Article status by PericlesofAthens (talk). Self-nominated at 02:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC).

  • On it.

    Thank you for your work on this needful article. If it's already GA, I'm sure the article will mostly be fine, but you need to go through these hooks again. They're both much too verbose and have some hiccups. ("Cit-states"?) Pare them down (e.g., "at the Battle of Chaeronea (338 BC)" could be "at Chaeronea") or come up with something terser and hookier that might grab the attention of people who don't know how cool the Macedonians were or connect to something they do know (e.g., something about the one-eyed Philip setting the stage for Alexander). Send me a message or use a notification template when you've got something for me to look at. — LlywelynII 08:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I have struck the original hooks, since they're both well over the maximum 200 characters (including spaces). I'm proposing a possible ALT2 hook below (184 characters), though I imagine PericlesofAthens will want to propose one or more new ALTs of his own. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: I'm fine with this. Thanks for revising the hook! Pericles of AthensTalk 16:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok. Sorry for delay but will look at this later today. — LlywelynII 11:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
  • LlywelynII, a friendly reminder--since I'm that kind of person. :) Drmies (talk) 04:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

New review

  • The article is recent GA at time of nomination: Green tickY
  • The hook is interesting: Green tickY
  • The hook is referenced: Green tickY
  • The hook is below 200 characters: Green tickY
  • Earwig tool does not reveal any copyright violation: Green tickY
  • The article follows most other important policies: Green tickY
  • QPQ exempted: Green tickY

Good to go.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)