Template:Did you know nominations/Right There (film)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Right There (film)
[edit]- ... that the 2013 short film Right There is a homage to comedies of the silent film-era?
Created/expanded by 72.74.202.207 (talk). Self nominated at 01:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC).
- Note: The DYK Check says this was created 12 May 2014, but that was a draft at AFC. It was actually moved into Mainspace on 8 June 2014, with This Edit. As such, it is posted under the correct date here on the nominations page — Maile (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: "award-winning" trimmed from hook - it's a rather minor award. Edwardx (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- New enough (DYK check says 8 June now) and long enough. The hook checks out online with citation #2. Although I accept this hook, I would prefer it to say "is an homage", but that is personal opinion. If the phrase "is a homage" is questioned, then it could easily be replaced with "pays homage" which is a better match to the citation, anyway. No problems with disambig links or with access to external links. I take it that the IP does not need to do a QPQ. The text is objectively-written and neutral in style; it is fully referenced. I have made one minor punctuation correction to the text (italics for one instance of Right There). Issue: Re spot checking for possible copyvio or close paraphrasing: one minor example found -
If you could kindly re-write the duplicated passage, this nom should be OK. --Storye book (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2014 (UTC)eating lunch on a park bench over the course of 30 days (citation #1)
- @ Maile or Edwardx. Please could you kindly assist with the above minor issue, because I cannot message the IP? Thank you. --Storye book (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Thank you, Edwardx. All issues resolved. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- New enough (DYK check says 8 June now) and long enough. The hook checks out online with citation #2. Although I accept this hook, I would prefer it to say "is an homage", but that is personal opinion. If the phrase "is a homage" is questioned, then it could easily be replaced with "pays homage" which is a better match to the citation, anyway. No problems with disambig links or with access to external links. I take it that the IP does not need to do a QPQ. The text is objectively-written and neutral in style; it is fully referenced. I have made one minor punctuation correction to the text (italics for one instance of Right There). Issue: Re spot checking for possible copyvio or close paraphrasing: one minor example found -