Template:Did you know nominations/Rheingauer Dom
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rheingauer Dom
[edit]
- ... that the facade and towers of the Gothic Rheingauer Dom (pictured) in Geisenheim were added in the 19th century?
- Reviewed: Fritz Delius
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nominated at 17:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC).
I am confused whether the nomination is eligible for date reasons or not because it was created with 807 prosa chars on August 13 from a redirect page and reached the length of 1,640 chars on August 20, the day of nomination. Isn't it a case of expansion instead of creation? If yes, then it wasn't expanded 5x as required. Please help. Otherwise, the article cites sources with inline citations and no close paraphrasing was found. Hook length is within limit, and it is interesting. Hook fact is inline cited, however the reference isn't online accessible for me. I AGF. QPQ was done. Image is ©-free under "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" and used in the article. I'll approve the nom when my above question is answered by an experienced reviewer with "it's eligibile". --CeeGee 08:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- My view: nominated within the 7 days after being an article from a redirect, which counts as creation. Doesn't matter how long it was when within these 7 days. Other voices welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps I count as an experienced reviewer: although not very active at DYK recently, I have 100+ DYKs to my credit. Turning a redirect into an article is the same as turning a redlink into an article, so as far as I can see it's eligible. Treat it as a article nominated within 7 days of creation, not as an expanded one. BencherliteTalk 16:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I see. Thanks for the explanation, and sorry for the delay. Maybe this point will be put someday into the eligibility criteria. It's now good to go. --CeeGee 17:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
