Template:Did you know nominations/Reward dependence

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 16:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Reward dependence

(

)

... that higher Reward dependence scores explain why Parkinson's disease patients on medications are impulsive gamblers?

ALT1:... that adolescents with Excessive Internet video Game Play (EIGP) addiction have higher Reward dependence scores on the Temperament and Character Inventory?
Comment: the source of the hooks can be found in the Addictive Behaviors and Reward Dependence section.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Geography of Coimbatore

5x expanded by Vishakavijayakumar (talk). Self nom at 12:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Long, detailed article covers the subject thoroughly. 5x expansion, date and hook OK. It is a pity that the author used such excessive capitalisation and bolding. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I now see there are copyright violations in the article. Sources copied include [1] [2] and [3]. Duplication detection reports are at [4], [5] & [6].

I have fixed all of the issues found with this article. I had a look at all of the duplication detection reports and have made all of the necessary changes to avoid copyright violations. I did notice that several of the duplications the reports mention are journal article titles, which I cannot do anything about. Also, there are several psychological and psychiatric terms that I will have to use as is and cannot be rephrased. There were also a few words/phrases that the reports mention, that have not been plagiarized, yet the report has just copied out similar wordings as duplicates. I did not fix those. The large pieces of texts that seem to have been copied, I did go in and fix them. I was under the impression that, just as in other articles we may write, if these were placed under quotations and cited that these should be ok. I apologize for the misunderstanding. I have fixed them all. Hopefully now the article meets all of the Wikipedia criteria. Vishakavijayakumar (talk) 22:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I've rechecked those sources and about another 10 and all seems fine now. Can I suggest that you change words in bold in the body of the article to italics, as in Wikipedia:Manual of style#Italics - bold is normally used only for the article title. Mikenorton (talk) 23:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

All done! Thanks! Vishakavijayakumar (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)