Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Rescatemos a David y Miguel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 05:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Rescatemos a David y Miguel

Rescatemos a David y Miguel
Rescatemos a David y Miguel
  • ... that you can leave a lock at the Rescatemos a David y Miguel memorial (pictured), installed six years ago today, as a symbol of demanding security?
Created by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 49 past nominations.

(CC) Tbhotch 19:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC).

  • Article is new and long enough, looks well-cited. Bad news is that I'm fairly certain that the images, including the one attached to the nom here, are copyrighted. I had a similar issue with a draft I'm working on and brought it to the Teahouse ([1]). I'm afraid you'll have to reupload the images as fair use and exclude them from the nom. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Briefly contemplated failing just out of shear envy, thought better of it. Can't say I know Spanish too well but I'm confident in the AGF on the citations, which are appropriately placed. QPQs done. The proposed run on 5 January is appropriate. Great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    • Regrettably, the QPQ done for Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Herman Allen was not adequate: while seven days is the standard for nominations to be made, DYK specifically allows a day or two latitude (typically given in general and particularly for new pre-QPQ participants as this nominator is); the nomination here was made nine days after creation. If Tbhotch will give this nomination a full review, a QPQ can be counted, or they can submit another review for that purpose. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
      • @BlueMoonset: It seems that you're failing this hook based on Tbhotch's literal interpretation of the reviewing guidelines. While you can contest their review (I'm not sure the term supersede is appropriate), this is almost certainly not sufficient ground to supersede my review of this hook. Reaffirming the AGF pass. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
@Tbhotch: Went to promote ALT1 (as ALT0 fails MOS:YOU); however the source only implies that it was installed on that date and does not spell it out.--Launchballer 22:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
@Launchballer: I ref-ed a more explicit link ([2]), page 136. (CC) Tbhotch 04:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)