Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald Mount

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) @ 18:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Reginald Mount

[edit]
  • ... that Reginald Mount and partner designed a renowned anti-venereal disease campaign in 1943–1944?
  • Reviewed: tbc

Created by Pigsonthewing (talk). Self nominated at 23:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC).

  • Creation date is fine (7 January) and hook is referenced, but not nearly long enough—I count 924 characters of readable prose, so quite a bit under the required 1,500. Also awaiting QPQ review. --Canley (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, can I suggest you link "VD" in the hook and the article to the Venereal disease redirect (to Sexually transmitted disease)? I don't think the term "VD" is widely used at all these days, in favour of "STD" or "STI", so it may be a bit confusing for some readers as to what the initialism refers to. --Canley (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't like hooks with more than one link, so I've explained the initialisation instead. I'll see if I can add some more content. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, fair enough, thanks for spelling out the abbreviation though. I notice you've expanded it a bit, but still too short at 1,406 characters. --Canley (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, long enough now at 1800 characters. Just the QPQ review to go—let me know if you've done one. --Canley (talk) 22:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I have just posted to the nominator's talk page, and given a deadline of February 4 to provide a QPQ review or request an extension. I hope we hear something by then. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Insomuch as QPQ review is donated and article is over a month old—if that is permitted then this is OK to go. --Canley (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)