Template:Did you know nominations/Ravinder Singh (author)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 10:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Ravinder Singh (author)

(

)

~~... that Ravinder Singh became a writer after he lost his love in an accident?~~
ALT ... that Ravinder Singh became a writer after he lost his love in an accident five days before they were to be engaged?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Why This Kolaveri Di

Created by Ansumang (talk). Self nom at 13:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Only 1213 characters of "readable prose". Needs at least 1500. Other checks not performed. --Allen3 ^talk 20:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Now 1796 characters. Thanks for reviewing. -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 08:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Passing comment. I think linking "writer" and "girlfriend" is overlinking. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

They should preferably be delinked, yes. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

(←) Done, now please do a final review. -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 08:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hook: This would probably draw more hits: ALT ... that Ravinder Singh became a writer after he lost his love in an accident five days before they were to be engaged?

Article: Long enough, new enough. Needs a copyedit; lots of missing articles and particles. Referencing is poor (quotes need references, all of them... and even then they are probably better at Wikiquote; also, two sentences need references).

Summary:

Needs more work. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

You should also work a bit on paraphrasing. For example, this and this have a bit too close paraphrasing. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the ALT and correcting the grammar. Few matched phrases are reference title and few I don't know how to alter. I think now it is good to go. -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 06:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

ALT1 good to go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)