Template:Did you know nominations/Qualcomm Snapdragon
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Maile (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Qualcomm Snapdragon
[edit]- ... that Qualcomm Snapdragon got its name because it "sounded fast and fierce"?
- Reviewed: Steve Moxon (whistleblower)
Improved to Good Article status by CorporateM (talk). Nominated by Sovereign Sentinel (talk) at 18:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC).
- I am the author of the article and I have a financial connection with the product's developer (Qualcomm). My understanding is that it's considered inappropriate for COI editors to nominate their own works for DIY, because in the past it has been abused as a method of getting exposure on Wikipedia's main page excessively. Even though I did not myself make this DIY nomination, I wish to voice my opposition for it, because I am concerned it will lead to unnecessary COI-drama. Also, DIYs are suppose to be motivational tools to give editors a pat on the back for doing good work, whereas I am paid for my work and do not require such soft incentives. All I ask for from the community is AGF, civility, freedom from harassment, and help when a disruptive editor prevents article improvement, etc.. These kinds of rewards should be reserved for the volunteers that are donating their free time. CorporateM (Talk) 22:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Article expander (that's the correct term; yes, it is) wishes to withdraw the nomination; seems like a smart idea based on the above rationale. Belle (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)