Template:Did you know nominations/Qila-i-Kuhna Mosque

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 09:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Qila-i-Kuhna Mosque

(

)

... that the Qila-i-Kuhna Mosque (pictured) in Purana Qila, Delhi, was originally intended to be built in marble, but as it ran out of supply, red sandstone had to be used?

Reviewed: James Rainwater

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 10:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC).

New enough and long enough, and well-sourced from books throughout. The hook is interesting, and I assume good faith as the citation is from a book not available online. QPQ done. Image is free and will have appropriate detail when condensed to a small size. '''tAD''' (talk) 16:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

QPQ was not adequately done: newness, length, and hook citation is far from complete. Royroydeb, please either cover the rest of the criteria on the Rainwater review, or submit another one that does. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: I have done it, have a look. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Royroydeb, two major components are close paraphrasing and neutrality, yet I see no mention of them in the new review. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: , Now check this Template:Did you know nominations/Bass Maltings, Sleaford. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

This is clearly good to go per The Almightey Drill, although i would add the article is neutral. Checked QPQ and it was updated accurately and the article was promoted.Blethering Scot 20:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)